Sixty years ago this week, a new Governor set North Carolina on a new course.
In his inauguration speech on January 5, 1961, Terry Sanford said the state should build its future not on low taxes, but on better education. Calling education â€œthe rock upon which I will build the house of my administration,â€ he said:
â€œWe must give our children the quality of education which they need to keep up in this rapidly advancing, scientific, complex world.
â€œThey must be prepared to compete with the best in the nation, and I dedicate my public life to the proposition that education must be of a quality which is second to none. A second-rate education can only mean a second-rate future for North Carolina.â€
For 50 years, North Carolina kept to that course under Sanford, Democratic Governors Jim Hunt, Mike Easley, Bev Perdue and Roy Cooper and Republican Governors Jim Holshouser and Jim Martin.
The state became a leader in the South and the nation. It became one of the best places in America to live and work. People from across the country and around the world flocked here.
But in 2010 we took a new turn. It was a wrong turn and the wrong path for our future.
The legislature retreated from North Carolinaâ€™s commitment to public education and public-school teachers. Legislators shortchanged public schools and shifted public tax dollars to private schools. They skimped on teacher pay and demonized and demoralized public-school teachers.
The Southern Regional Education Board says teachers in North Carolina today earn 25.3% per week less than similarly educated professionals.
Some legislators and their supporters call public schools â€œgovernment schools.â€ Their hostility is obvious.
Today, we need a renewed debate over the right way forward. Itâ€™s the same debate Sanford sparked.
In 1957, then-Governor Luther Hodges proposed tax cuts and tax breaks for business and industry. Hodges was a businessman himself, a retired textile executive. He was comfortable in boardrooms, and he was successful in recruiting businesses to North Carolina.
In their book â€œTerry Sanford: Politics, Progress and Outrageous Ambitionsâ€ (Duke University Press, 1999), Howard Covington and Marion Ellis called Hodgesâ€™s plan â€œtrickle-down.â€ The theory was, â€œIf business and industry expandedâ€¦then the stateâ€™s tax base would expand and there would be more money for schools and other state services.â€
Sanford quickly challenged Hodges. Tossing aside a prepared speech on constitutional revisions to a Young Democrats meeting, he called the Governorâ€™s approach â€œdangerously wrong.â€
He said the state instead should raise standards of education. That would attract jobs and industry.
Sanford believed North Carolinians would pay higher taxes for better schools. At one campaign stop, he was asked how heâ€™d pay for his plan. Seeing no reporters, Sanford replied, â€œFrom taxes.â€
The crowd applauded. Sanford beamed. Later, his no-nonsense campaign manager Bert Bennett told him, â€œThey thought you said Texas.â€
But Sanford meant taxes. He supported a $100 million (big bucks then) increase in school spending â€“ a 22% pay raise for teachers, the hiring of 2,800 new teachers, more libraries and school supplies and the beginning of the community college system.
To pay for it all, he won a bitter battle to levy the sales tax on food, which became known as â€œTerryâ€™s tax.â€ The tax hurt him politically. But he got the job done. It wasnâ€™t a â€œhold the lineâ€ budget, he said, it was a â€œline of departure.â€
North Carolina took off.
We hear the same debate in Raleigh today: low taxes or better schools. The legislature now is, as Sanford said then, â€œdangerously wrong.â€ We need to set our course right again.